We work on understanding how international and national politics and policies affect each other, as well as the effect of climate policy instruments, focusing in particular on the global climate negotiations, climate policy in the EU, USA, China and Norway.
About the research group
We are distinguished researchers within international relations, EU studies, comparative and national climate policy, and Science and Technology Studies (STS).
We study climate policy and politics in a broad perspective, spanning governance, party politics, policy change, policy instruments, different actors’ positions and influence on climate policy and negotiations, synergies and trade-offs between different policies, sectors and goals, public attitudes and polarisation, and science-policy interfaces.
Our researchers cooperate with other leading international scholars of environmental governance. Prof. Arild Underdal is a ‘Foreign Associate’ of the American National Academy of Sciences, and Prof. Elin Lerum Boasson is a lead author in IPCC WG3 on national climate policy. An external evaluation from 2018 commissioned by the Research Council of Norway gave the group and associated research partners a top score, concluding it was “a world-leading group of researchers in the field of international climate policy negotiations and effectiveness”.
Key research areas include:
EU studies. Our researchers explore the development of the EU Green Deal, focusing on climate and energy policies – how they develop in Brussels, how they affect national policy development and how Brexit matters. Theoretically, we contribute to theories relating to European integration and Europeanisation. Also in Norway, this is particularly important and high on the agenda, as highlighted with the joint implementation with the EU of the climate targets.
Comparative climate politics. We analyse and compare political, economic, organisational and other factors for policy development and implementation within and across countries. We follow policy developments in Norway and other European countries, as well as Australia, Brazil, India, and the USA. We have particularly solid knowledge on Norwegian climate policy developments relating to petroleum, renewable energy, energy efficiency, transport, agriculture, REDD+ and carbon capture and storage.
International climate politics. Our researchers have for many years studied the international climate negotiations under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The focus has been on effectiveness in cooperation and agreements, logics, norms and interests influencing parties and other actors in international climate governance, and the relationship between international negotiations and domestic climate policy developments.
Science-policy interfaces. We analyze science-policy interfaces across different policy levels and contexts, such as the policy relevance of the IPCC and other knowledge sources. This string of work is grounded in Science and Technology Studies (STS) and studies the role of expertise (such as climate mitigation scenarios) in climate mitigation, including tensions between different policy targets and sources of expertise.
Synergies and trade-offs. Our research on synergies and trade-offs related to climate policies is important for contributing to solutions that support sustainable development. One issue that we focus on is conflicts between biodiversity and climate measures like in renewable energy projects. We analyse such dilemmas and ways to deal with them, including in light of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Public acceptance and polarisation. Climate policies need public support but may also lead to opposition and polarisation. We have several ongoing projects analysing these issues, and how they can be dealt with.
We experience broad demand for our knowledge from media, policy makers, civil society, and the private sector. We disseminate directly to decision makers in both the public and private sector – enabling them to make better informed climate related decisions. Our results also gain interest abroad, for example at COPs and in Brussels. Our research has had a demonstrated impact on the Paris negotiations as well as on Norwegian climate policies and targets.
The different researchers have strong competence in mainly four methodological areas: Qualitative research including in-depth analyses of single cases and comparative case studies; quantitative research ranging from surveys, statistics and complex econometric models; formal logic (rational choice models, particularly game theory); and simulations applying agent-based modelling.
Members of the group
Wind power and export of electricity are controversial topics. Understanding what makes them controversial can lead to improved regulations and more broadly acceptable solutions.
Renewable energy | Norwegian climate policy | Wind power | Acceptance
POPCLIM: Right-wing populism and the political feasibility of climate policy
This project seeks to understand the relationship between right-wing populism (RWP) and opposition to climate science and policy, and to identify climate policy options that are politically feasible even in electorates inclined to support RWP.
International climate policy | Norwegian climate policy | Acceptance
INDGREEN: India’s ambitions and possibilities of becoming a global green leader
In the research project INDGREEN, CICERO will contribute to understanding the relationship between India’s handling of its low-carbon domestic development and its role in international climate negotiations.
Adaptation | Just transition | International climate policy | Climate negotiations | Renewable energy | Energy consumption
PARIS REINFORCE: Delivering on the Paris Agreement: A demand-driven, integrated assessment modelling approach
The PARIS REINFORCE EU-funded project is developing a novel, demand-driven, integrated assessment model-oriented framework for effectively supporting the design and analysis of climate policies in the EU as well as in other major emitters and selected less emitting countries.
Utslippsscenarier | Klimapolitikk i EU | Klimapolitikk internasjonalt | Globale klimamål | Emission scenarios | EU climate policy | International climate policy | Global climate targets
From Arctic Science to Global Policy – Addressing Multiple Stressors Under the Stockholm Convention
Eirik Hovland Steindal, Marianne Karlsson, Erlend A T Hermansen et al.
Arctic Review on Law and Politics , 2021
Does size matter? Comparing the party politics of climate change in Australia and Norway
Fay Madeleine Farstad
Academic chapter/article/Conference paper